Search for: All records

The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families. 

Abstract Sequence-specific activation by transcription factors is essential for gene regulation^1,2. Key to this are activation domains, which often fall within disordered regions of transcription factors^3,4and recruit co-activators to initiate transcription⁵. These interactions are difficult to characterize via most experimental techniques because they are typically weak and transient^6,7. Consequently, we know very little about whether these interactions are promiscuous or specific, the mechanisms of binding, and how these interactions tune the strength of gene activation. To address these questions, we developed a microfluidic platform for expression and purification of hundreds of activation domains in parallel followed by direct measurement of co-activator binding affinities (STAMMPPING, for Simultaneous Trapping of Affinity Measurements via a Microfluidic Protein-Protein INteraction Generator). By applying STAMMPPING to quantify direct interactions between eight co-activators and 204 human activation domains (>1,500K_ds), we provide the first quantitative map of these interactions and reveal 334 novel binding pairs. We find that the metazoan-specific co-activator P300 directly binds >100 activation domains, potentially explaining its widespread recruitment across the genome to influence transcriptional activation. Despite sharing similar molecular properties (e.g.enrichment of negative and hydrophobic residues), activation domains utilize distinct biophysical properties to recruit certain co-activator domains. Co-activator domain affinity and occupancy are well-predicted by analytical models that account for multivalency, andin vitroaffinities quantitatively predict activation in cells with an ultrasensitive response. Not only do our results demonstrate the ability to measure affinities between even weak protein-protein interactions in high throughput, but they also provide a necessary resource of over 1,500 activation domain/co-activator affinities which lays the foundation for understanding the molecular basis of transcriptional activation. 

The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins combined with the exposure of their residues accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that is concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family, synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results demonstrate that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet, the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families. 

ABSTRACT Intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs) are ubiquitous across all kingdoms of life and play a variety of essential cellular roles. IDRs exist in a collection of structurally distinct conformers known as an ensemble. An IDR’s amino acid sequence determines its ensemble, which in turn can play an important role in dictating molecular function. Yet a clear link connecting IDR sequence, its ensemble properties, and its molecular function in living cells has not been directly established. Here, we set out to test this sequence-ensemble-function paradigm using a novel computational method (GOOSE) that enables the rational design of libraries of IDRs by systematically varying specific sequence properties. Using ensemble FRET, we measured the ensemble dimensions of a library of rationally designed IDRs in human-derived cell lines, revealing how IDR sequence influences ensemble dimensionsin situ.Furthermore, we show that the interplay between sequence and ensemble can tune an IDR’s ability to sense changes in cell volume - ade novomolecular function for these synthetic sequences. Our results establish biophysical rules for intracellular sequence-ensemble relationships, enable a new route for understanding how IDR sequences map to function in live cells, and set the ground for the design of synthetic IDRs withde novofunction. 

Proteins must be hydrated to function. Desiccation, a common event in an increasing number of ecosystems, can drive proteome-wide unfolding and aggregation. For cells to survive, proteins must disaggregate and retain their function upon rehydration. The molecular determinants that underlie protein desiccation resistance remain unknown. Here, we use mass spectrometry to show that some proteins possess an innate ability to survive dehydration and subsequent rehydration. Structural analysis correlates the ability of proteins to resist desiccation with their surface area chemistry. Remarkably, highly resistant proteins are responsible for the production of the cell's building blocks - amino acids, metabolites, and sugars. Conversely, those proteins that are desiccation-sensitive are responsible for ribosome biogenesis. As a result, the rehydrated proteome is preferentially enriched with metabolite and small molecule producers and depleted of ribosomes - the cell's heaviest consumers. We propose this functional bias allows cells to kickstart their metabolism and promote cell survival upon rehydration. 

Gene expression in Arabidopsis is regulated by more than 1,900 transcription factors (TFs), which have been identified genome-wide by the presence of well-conserved DNA-binding domains. Activator TFs contain activation domains (ADs) that recruit coactivator complexes; however, for nearly all Arabidopsis TFs, we lack knowledge about the presence, location and transcriptional strength of their ADs1. To address this gap, here we use a yeast library approach to experimentally identify Arabidopsis ADs on a proteome-wide scale, and find that more than half of the Arabidopsis TFs contain an AD. We annotate 1,553 ADs, the vast majority of which are, to our knowledge, previously unknown. Using the dataset generated, we develop a neural network to accurately predict ADs and to identify sequence features that are necessary to recruit coactivator complexes. We uncover six distinct combinations of sequence features that result in activation activity, providing a framework to interrogate the subfunctionalization of ADs. Furthermore, we identify ADs in the ancient AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR family of TFs, revealing that AD positioning is conserved in distinct clades. Our findings provide a deep resource for understanding transcriptional activation, a framework for examining function in intrinsically disordered regions and a predictive model of ADs.